The Voice of Epidemiology

    
    


    Web EpiMonitor

► Home ► About ► News ► Job Bank Events ► Resources ► Contact
Articles Briefs People Blog Books Forum Quote of the Week Reprint of the Month
   

Top Ten Stories of 2012 in The Epidemiology Monitor

Nominations Invited For A List Of Top Epidemiology Stories of 2012 From Any Source
 

Each new year, we review the top health  stories of the previous year in the mass media and select the most interesting stories from an epidemiologist’s perspective. Our selection this year is restricted to articles which have appeared in the newsletter and not in the mass media. They are all of potential or actual relevance for our epidemiology readers.

We welcome your nominations for the top epidemiology stories of 2012 appearing in any publication or outlet. These could be what you consider the most notable research results, methods contributions, public health achievements, books published, conferences held, policies adopted, or other significant contributions. We will publish your nominations, and, if we receive enough entries, will create a list of the Top Epidemiology-Wide Stories of 2012.  Send your nominations to epimon@aol.com 

Here are our most notable stories from The Epidemiology Monitor.

1. Bill Foege, Epidemiologist and Former CDC Director, Awarded Presidential Medal Of Freedom

Bill Foege, an epidemiologist and former CDC Director and global health advisor to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, was awarded the Presidential Medal of Honor in May 2012. President Obama called the medal “the highest civilian honor this country can bestow”. (May 2012) http://tinyurl.com/ajdz7eq

2. The Use Of Epidemiologic Evidence For Public Health Is Doomed To Fail Without Champions According To Tobacco Control Expert

It’s a paradox. Smoking and lung cancer are the perfect example of the power of epidemiologic evidence to bring about important social change, and the perfect example of the inadequacy of data to bring about important social change, according to Matthew Myers, President of the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. (June 2012) http://tinyurl.com/b4drjwy

 

3. Epidemiology Consortium Speaks Out On The Well-Established Dangers of Asbestos

Obviously, reporting on the dangers of asbestos is not news, nor is it news to document what control or prevention measures should be used. What is eye-opening, however, is that the paper goes further than a typical literature review and points out that unnecessary obstacles to prevention have been raised.

“The use of asbestos not only causes a human tragedy, but also an economic disaster,” according to the Committee. (July-August 2012)  http://tinyurl.com/bj3dk63

 

4. Institute Of Medicine Committee Says Need To Address Upstream Causes of Ill-Health “Could Not Be More Pronounced”

The status of the United States as an outlier in health could not be presented more dramatically than it is on the graph of health spending and life expectancy prepared by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) showing the US ranks 28th in life expectancy. Compared to the other OECD countries, the United States at $7960 spends more than two times the average of OECD countries and 3-7 more than some of the rapidly advancing countries such as Poland and Czech Republic. According to the Institute of Medicine Committee on Public Health Strategies, “Debate over America’s place at the top of economic superpowers aside, it is clear that it is not a superpower in health.” (April 2012)  http://tinyurl.com/atjy22c

5. Science Denialism Is Topic Of University of Wisconsin Science Writers Conference On The Challenges Of Communicating Research Findings

Presentation Of The “Playbook” Used By Science Deniers Is Well Received

Recently, a conference and workshop were held at the University of Wisconsin to dissect the causes of “science denial” and to apply the insights gleaned to devising more effective communication. The lessons learned and ideas for solutions may be of considerable interest to epidemiologists. The arguments or “playbook” used by science deniers includes: He said that he can now fit any argument made against evolution or scientific topics into one of these six categories. They are:

1. Doubt the science

2. Question the motives or integrity of the scientists.

3. Magnify the disagreements by citing gadflies as authorities.

4. Exaggerate potential harms even if the science is correct.

5. Appeal to personal freedom

6. Acceptance would repudiate a key philosophy or belief

(Sept 2012)  http://tinyurl.com/b5wylpc

 

 6. Ethics Guidelines Revised By Environmental Epidemiologists To Take Better Account Of Emerging Challenges In The Field

“Perhaps more than most other applied sciences, the discipline of environmental epidemiology faces significant ethical challenges because of the involvement of powerful stakeholders whose influence may affect all levels of research and policy formulation.” So write Shira Kramer, Colin Soskolne, B. Adetune Mustapha, and Wael K. Al-Delaimy, in the August issue of Environmental Health Perspectives in introducing new revised ethics guidelines for the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology. The basic principles were judged by the authors to be broadly applicable to the practice of epidemiology. (Sept 2012)  http://tinyurl.com/b4rcs3m

 

7. Paper in Epidemiology Proposes Creation Of A New Knowledge Translation Subspecialty

Writing in this month’s issue of Epidemiology, David Dowdy and Madhuhar Pai make a case for creating “Accountable Health Advocates” (AHA’s), a new subspecialty of epidemiologists which would focus more intentionally on the translation or use of epidemiologic findings to improve public health.

Support for this work would come from a reallocation of resources or creation of new rewards and incentives for epidemiologists who chose this career path. At present, the authors say there are many disincentives for epidemiologists to advocate for the utilization of established evidence, including “professional fallout” from a perceived lack of objectivity and difficulty of publishing such work in scientific  journals. (Oct 2012)  http://tinyurl.com/adksace

8. National Research Council Issues Report On Using Science As Evidence In Public Policy


Despite the much touted evidence-based policy and practice movement of recent years, a new National Research Council report reaches the striking conclusion that “studies of knowledge utilization have not advanced understanding of the use of evidence in the policy process much beyond the decades-old National Research Council (1978) report.” That report, entitled “Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection” failed to find systematic evidence that social science evidence was being used. The findings from both reports are bleak and apply to all the sciences says the NRC since knowledge from all sciences is potentially relevant to policy choices. (Nov 2012)  http://tinyurl.com/bjqnkau

 

9. Distracted Driving Called “Epidemic On America’s Roadways”

                        Phones May Be A Deadly, Addictive Risk Factor Like Smoking

“Every single time you take your eyes off the road or talk on the phone while you’re driving—even for just a few seconds—you put yourself and others in danger,” according to Ray LaHood, US Secretary of Transportation. According to LaHood, nearly 5,500 persons were killed and 450,000 injured in distracted driving crashes in 2009. That translates into nearly 15 people dying and 1,200 being injured each day in the United States from distracted driving. Among those killed or injured in 2009, nearly 1,000 deaths and 24,000 injuries included cell phone use as a major distraction, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. LaHood calls distracted driving “an epidemic on America’s roadways.” (Feb 2012)  http://tinyurl.com/9wevjfj

10. Surprise Decision Ends The Young Epidemiology Scholars (YES) Program

“Devastated, dismayed, and surprised” is how Kevin Xu described his reaction and that of fellow alumni upon hearing the news about the termination of the much praised and highly valued Young Epidemiology Scholars (YES) program, a college scholarship competition in epidemiology for high school students. The program was sponsored by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) and administered by the College Board. 

The program was established in 2003 and eight competitions were held over the life of the program. During this time, approximately 5,000 students from all 50 states participated in the program. YES awarded $3.7 million in scholarships to 976 students. The top winners received awards ranging from 15K to 50K. (June 2012). http://tinyurl.com/b9eexha 

 


Reader Comments:
Have a thought or comment on this story ?  Fill out the information below and we'll post it on this page once it's been reviewed by our editors.
 

       
  Name:        Phone:   
  Email:         
  Comment: 
                 
 
       

           


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
      ©  2011 The Epidemiology Monitor

Privacy  Terms of Use  Sitemap

Digital Smart Tools, LLC