The Voice of Epidemiology

    
    


    Web EpiMonitor

► Home ► About ► News ► Jobs ► Events ► Resources ► Contact

Keynotes

Humor Quotes Wit & Wisdom EpiSource Miscellany Editor's Tips Triumphs Links Archives
 


Epi Wit & Wisdom Resources

Obtaining Private Foundation Funding: One Epidemiologist’s Success Story

By Patricia Meinhardt, MD, MPH, MA

If you think you have a terrific idea for an epidemiology-based project but are uncertain of your proposal’s chances for traditional federal funding, this feature may be of interest to you. As we are all aware, obtaining governmental funding for biomedical research has become a more difficult and time-consuming process for epidemiologists in virtually all health-related fields over the past ten years. However, during this same time period, non-governmental funding for health-related issues including private foundation support has increased dramatically. Although governmental sources of private funding are generally well- known to most epidemiologists, identifying potential sources of private funding opportunities is often a challenging and frustrating task.

The purpose of this article is to provide an example from my own consulting practice that describes the “trials and tribulations” of successfully obtaining private foundation funding for a specific project. I will also describe the unexpected consequences of obtaining these private foundation monies when additional funding sponsors were approached to fully finance the proposed project. At the conclusion of this feature, I will highlight several resource guides and electronic databases that were invaluable to me during this process which identify private funding opportunities as well as provide suggestions for preparing a successful proposal.

A Fundable Idea is Born

In May of 1995, my colleagues and I from the National Association of Physicians for the Environment (NAPE) developed a concept for an educational conference that would address the clinical and public health consequences resulting from exposure to toxic agents and infectious pathogens in contaminated US water reserves. As a specialist in occupational and environmental medicine with a research interest in the epidemiology of waterborne pathogens, one of my primary goals for this project was to provide a forum for discussion of the complex epidemiologic aspects of several major waterborne diseases.

As my colleagues and I “shopped our idea around” at various federal agencies responsible for maintaining water quality and safety in the US, our proposed project was greeted with routinely complimentary comments such as “highly commendable” and “extremely timely.” In fact, our proposal received a recommendation for approval by one federal agency but was not funded as a result of the ongoing federal budget crisis at the time.

Frustrated But Not Willing to Quit

My colleagues and I were frustrated but committed to the importance of water pollution as a public health issue and convinced of the potential benefits of our proposed project. At this juncture, we turned our attention to investigating the possibilities of obtaining private foundation support for our water pollution project. After exploring the types of foundations that were interested in funding water pollution issues, it was immediately apparent that the geographic scope of our conference needed to be regional rather than national in focus.

One area of priority for several private foundations was protection of the water quality in the Great Lakes ecosystem. In light of the history of toxic water pollution in the Great Lakes region in combination with the massive outbreak of waterborne cryptosporidiosis in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, the Great Lakes region certainly provided an appropriate location and focus for our project. We submitted proposals to several regional private foundations interested in funding projects that addressed water quality and safety in the Great Lakes region.

Success at Last, But...

In early 1996, we were informed by the C.S. Mott Foundation that we had been awarded $40,000 for our water pollution conference. Although we were delighted with this support, the proposed budget for completion of our project and follow-up educational outreach effort was approximately $100,000. Therefore, we had arrived at another interesting juncture in our funding quest with a significant commitment from a highly respected private foundation but only partial funding of our proposed project.

What was unclear at this point was the unforeseen effect of this initial private foundation funding as we approached other potential funding sponsors in order to reach our budgetary goal. With the C.S. Mott Foundation support “in hand,” other private and professional organizations interested in environmental protection and water quality began to pledge financial support for our water pollution conference. Eventually our funding sponsors included not only the C.S. Mott Foundation but the American Water Works Association, the Water Environmental Association, and Baxter International, Inc. Interestingly, by the end of the process, we also received federal support for our project from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the Office of Water at the Environmental Protection Agency.

A Small Idea Grows Larger!

With interest in our water pollution conference growing and financial support of our project increasing, we were encouraged by our funding sponsors to expand the parameters of our conference to include not only Great Lakes water pollution issues but national and international water quality concerns as well.  Although the emphasis of the conference continued to focus on the water quality of the Great Lakes, national and international water pollution issues were incorporated into the agenda of our project.

Eventually, several other professional organizations extended “in-kind” support to our comprehensive conference agenda and educational program. In addition to our seven major funding sponsors, our list of co-sponsors grew to fourteen including the American Medical Association, International Society of Doctors for the Environment, National Association of County and City Health Officials, Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics and the American Veterinary Medical Association.

International Conference on Water Pollution and Health

In May of 1997, our initial concept was actualized as a two day international conference addressing the health effects of global water pollution and was attended by approximately 175 invited medical and public health professionals from around the world. As co-chair of the conference, I was able to incorporate into the agenda a discussion of the epidemiology of waterborne disease caused by both toxic and infectious agents. The conference and follow-up educational program also provided a valuable forum to emphasize the importance of epidemiologic investigation and research in the evaluation and prevention of water pollution.

Although the time from inception of our idea to completion of the project was nearly two years in length and filled with frustration, the conference was a tremendous success. My colleagues and I are convinced that our initial private foundation funding was the pivotal turning point that lead to our subsequent achievement!

Published February 1998 

 

 
      ©  2011 The Epidemiology Monitor

Privacy  Terms of Use  |  Sitemap

Digital Smart Tools, LLC