The Voice of Epidemiology

    
    


    Web EpiMonitor

► Home ► About ► News ► Job Bank Events ► Resources ► Contact
 


Infectious Disease Epidemiologist Offers Key Points To Consider About COVID-19 In Extensive USA Today Interview

Michael Osterholm, the epidemiologist director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota is a frequent spokesperson on television and in other media on topics related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Osterholm prides himself in offering what he calls “straight talk” about the pandemic and he often has a different perspective on current events in epidemiology.

He was interviewed in mid-May by the Editorial Board at USA Today and provided answers to a long list of questions. Many of his answers offered useful metaphors and insightful points to consider about the pandemic. Some of these useful metaphors and points to consider are described below, including selected excerpts from the interview.

Seasonality

One of the questions on everyone’s mind is whether or not COVID-19 will manifest a marked seasonality this coming summer as does influenza virus and other respiratory illnesses. If it does, we assume this will give everyone a breather and will be welcome news. Not Osterholm. He told USA Today “Right now the thing that scares me more than anything is that suddenly, in the next two months, cases in the US suddenly drop off dramatically… It would give people a premature sense of euphoria… but to me it would look a lot better if we kept in this slow burn…If we have a big fall peak, it’ll redefine us as we are as a modern society.”

Danger of a Second Wave

To better explain his concern about the danger from a second wave next fall, Osterholm indicated that in most areas of the country the estimated percentage of persons with a history of COVID-19 is in the single digit range. Unfortunately, population level or herd immunity will have to reach 60-70% in the opinion of most experts before the US is protected from large numbers of infections.

According to Osterholm, “Think what we have to go through. This damn virus is going to keep going until it affects everybody that it possibly can.”

Leadership & Plan Missing

One of the themes that has been struck by Osterholm over and over again in his many interactions with the media is the question of leadership and another is the lack of a coordinated plan.

He told USA Today, “I have a major, major concern about leadership right now. We’re not where we need to be, either from an execution standpoint or understanding the problem. We’re just in the second inning of a nine-inning game…My job is not to scare people out of their wits, it’s to scare them into their wits.”

Tradeoffs

A major tension throughout the pandemic has been the tradeoff between the public health benefits of control measures and the benefits of maintaining the economy. According to Osterholm, “This shouldn’t be dollars or lives. This should be, how do we integrate both and bring them together? How do we make tough choices? That’s not happening. That’s leadership again…It’s not a partisan issue. It shouldn’t be.” He adds, “We’ve been out there trying to get this discussion going, and it just falls on deaf ears because it’s too hard.”

Lack of Readiness

One of the perplexing elements of what has taken place in the decision of many states to loosen their social distancing measures is that they have done so without having in place the testing, tracing, and tracking infrastructure that public health officials have been saying the US will need if it is to effectively contain new cases as they emerge after a decline in cases takes place.

Osterholm notes in his interview that “Four weeks ago we had everybody agreeing that we’re going to reopen once we have 14 days of reduced occurrence of illness. Then, when it got another couple of weeks along and that wasn’t happening, we just threw all that out the window without ever saying we did.”

Riding the Tiger

When it comes to controlling the pandemic, the point is often made that because SARS-CoV-2 is a new virus, there is no easy way out of this challenge short of developing a safe and effective vaccine. Osterholm makes this point about the difficulty of controlling the situation by saying “…we’re not driving this tiger, we’re riding it…We are not going to determine the course of this pandemic beyond potentially flattening some of the peaks or in some ways limiting high-risk people from potentially getting infected and having bad outcomes.”

Contact Tracing Not A Panacea

Osterholm is one of the few epidemiology commentators to point out the difficulties of implementing the much touted contact tracing that will need to be done effectively to contain cases. That’s because contact tracing only works when you have a relatively small and manageable number of cases. According to Osterholm, “Once you see a big escalation in cases, you’ll be having contacts by the many thousands and thousands and thousands, and it’s just not going to work…It’s not a panacea.”

A recent report documenting that a new vaccine being developed by Moderna has shown an immune response similar to that of persons who have recovered from COVID-19 is good news on the vaccine front. There are multiple scientific challenges that will need to be overcome to successfully create and test a safe and effective vaccine. However, there are also many ethical and practical issues that will need to be addressed.

According to Osterholm, we have no plan in place for what to do once a vaccine is in hand. “What if the Chinese get the vaccine first? What if we get it first? Will we share it with anybody? Boy, I’m going to tell you right now, the answer I’m getting out of this administration is “hell no”. Well then, why would the Chinese want to share a vaccine with us? Why would the Europeans want to share vaccine?...We don’t have enough of a way of sharing.”

D-Day Like Plan Needed

He adds using another analogy, “If there was ever a time that we need to have a unified response plan, and I know this sounds trite, I liken it to D-Day. I want my Eisenhower right now with every allied country around the table and when Ike calls it, it goes. That's what we need right now. We need a D-Day plan. We don't have it.

I worry we're going to have all these different countries marching to their own drummer. To me, that's the biggest challenge that nobody is talking about. The R&D is huge. Safety is huge. But in the end the biggest tragedy would be to have a vaccine and not be able to get it used in the way it should be used.”

To read the interview in full, visit:  https://bit.ly/2XoXMy2    ■

 

Reader Comments:
Have a thought or comment on this story ?  Fill out the information below and we'll post it on this page once it's been reviewed by our editors.
 

       
  Name:        Phone:   
  Email:         
  Comment: 
                 
 
       

           


 

 
 
 
      ©  2011 The Epidemiology Monitor

Privacy  Terms of Use  Sitemap

Digital Smart Tools, LLC