One-Day IJE Sponsored Conference Touches On Many Current Issues In
Epidemiology
Agreement On The
Field’s Purpose Still Elusive
Back in 2001 the new editors of the International
Journal of Epidemiology (IJE) asked—“Epidemiology: Is it time to call
it a day?” That was a direct question and their answer was no. At the
recent IJE one day conference 16 years later, the editors launched
their conference by asking another more ambiguous question --“ Is
(publishing) epidemiology history?” and the answers were expected to
be more nuanced, according to Shah Ebrahim, co-editor of the
IJE.
He explained why to The Epidemiology Monitor. “This is
a consequence of trends in methods of communicating scientific
findings, our own experience of editing the IJE, a belief that knowing
what went before is fundamental to doing better studies and gaining
greater understanding, and the growth of modern epidemiological
methods,” he said.
Conference Topics
Among the topics touched upon at the conference were
aspects of the history and future of epidemiology, its relationships
with other areas of science, funding, data access, and public
understanding and media interest in epidemiological findings. The
speakers and topics are listed at the end of this article.
Why Epidemiology
Matters
According to Ebrahim and co-editor George Davey Smith, the
talks provoked considerable discussion about the direction of
epidemiology. For example, the talk given by Katherine Keyes of
Columbia on why epidemiology matters laid out very clearly the ideas
underlying what epidemiology was and what it is becoming.
She stressed the importance of maintaining the broad scope of
epidemiology (beyond causal inference). Her promotion of “population
health sciences” as a means of teaching and practicing what seems to
be getting pushed out in the USA (with strong emphasis on causal
inference as the main purpose of epidemiology) is highly relevant,
they said.
Uses of Epidemiology
The authors added, “in the UK, causal inference in
terms of the potential outcomes approach is not taught in MSc
Epidemiology courses so perhaps the need for a new discipline of
“population health sciences” is less obvious. What is very clear is
that the original ideas about the uses of epidemiology, advanced by
Jerry Morris, Mervyn
Susser,
and others need to be taught and understood by current and future
generations of epidemiologists.”
Reaction To Presentations
Richard Smith,
former editor of the British Medical Journal and a speaker at the
conference, blogged that attending the conference was like a
schadenfreude experience “…as an outsider to watch a professional
group agonize over who they are, whether they matter, whether their
methods are adequate, and whether they are missing something
important."
Smith described the presentation by geographer
Danny Dorling who reported on both increases (bad news) and
decreases (good news) in morbidity/mortality in different populations
and asked why these events have not been given more attention by
epidemiologists. The answer, at least for some in the room, according
to Smith, was that “epidemiologists had lost their way in ever
cleverer mathematics, complex software programmes they barely
understand, arcane debates over methods, and increasingly
sophisticated studies of questions that hardly matter.”
Ben Goldacre,
also a presenter at the conference on data transparency, called the
meeting a “victory lap” for Ebrahim and Davey-Smith. He went on to
describe the talks by each speaker in a phrase or two and encouraged
readers on his Bad Science blog to “settle in” and watch the videos of
all the speakers. “Nothing on telly is worth
the candle”, he added.
Luisa Zuccolo,
also at Bristol University, in her recap of the conference on the IJE
blog concluded that “ it left more questions than answers.”
Allegiances In
Epidemiology
This conference was not the first to provoke
epidemiologists to reflect on their core identity. At least one
earlier conference in Birmingham Alabama in 1989 (See Epi Monitor June
1989) raised questions about the purposes of epidemiology. At that
meeting, Albert Jonsen, a professor of ethics in medicine at
the University of Washington, said “at the heart of efforts to develop
a code of ethics for epidemiologists is the need to determine what are
our allegiances. Do these allegiances have priorities? To the truth?
To the social welfare? To the employers? What is epidemiology all
about? When there is communal agreement about these issues,
epidemiologists can develop a code of ethics.”
It appears those conversations are also needed for
answering questions about the value of epidemiology and its uses in
the larger society. The needed conversations have been lacking and the
communal agreement appears to have eluded the profession.
Videos of the individual presentations at the
conference can be accessed at the links below.
December Issue of IJE
Participants at the conference also heard about plans for the December
issue of IJE on Causality in
Epidemiology. It will contain lengthy articles and
commentaries from leading epidemiologists and book reviews of
VanderWeele’s and Pearl’s new textbooks on causality, according to the
editors. They told the Epidemiology Monitor “It will probably be the
largest single issue we have published and will provide readers with
an up to date and comprehensive review of schools of thought in
causality. Perhaps the most important aspect are the commentaries of
epidemiologists from different schools commenting on each others
ideas.”
Entitled Causality in Epidemiology—The Last Frontier, some of the
articles have already been published online. Readers can access them
from the links at the end of this article.
Topics and Speakers at IJE Conference
George Davey Smith:
Epidemiology after 2017: methods or matter?
School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol
Danny Dorling: Epidemiology:
abandoning the social. How deaths in England and Wales rose in a year
by 5%, in Scotland by 9%, but epidemiologists were too busy with the
genome to notice the bills of mortality
School of Geography and the Environment, University of
Oxford
Shah Ebrahim: IJE
2000-2016: what happened?
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine;
University of Bristol
Ben Goldacre:
Data access and transparency
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of
Oxford
Katherine
Keyes: Why
does epidemiology matter?
Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
Tom Koch: Mapping
history into the future
Department of Geography, University of British Columbia
Martin McKee: Epidemiology
in the age of austerity
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Alex Mold: Placing
the public in public health: epidemiology and the public in post-war
public health
Centre for History in Public Health, London School of Hygiene and
Tropical Medicine
Richard Smith: The
death of journals can’t come soon enough
Chair, International Disease Research
Links to the videos for these talks can be found at:
https://tinyurl.com/gvvafc8
Articles Published Early Online From
IJE December Issue On Causality
Krieger N and Davey Smith G. The tale wagged by the DAG: broadening
the scope of causal inference and explanation for epidemiology
http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/09/28/ije.dyw114.full
Vandenbroucke et al. Causality and causal inference in epidemiology:
the need for a pluralistic approach
http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/01/21/ije.dyv341.full
VanderWeele et al. Letter to the Editor: Re: Causality and causal
inference in epidemiology: the need for a pluralistic approach
http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/08/08/ije.dyw162.full
Chiolero A. Letter to the Editor: Counterfactual and interventionist
approach to cure risk factor epidemiology
http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/08/08/ije.dyw159.full
Schooling CM et al. Letter to the Editor: Causality and causal
inference in epidemiology: we need also to address causes of effects
http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/08/08/ije.dyw160.full
Broadbent A et al. Letter to the Editor: Authors’ Reply to:
VanderWeele et al., Chiolero, and Schooling et al.
http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/08/08/ije.dyw163.full
■
|