The Voice of Epidemiology

    
    


    Web EpiMonitor

► Home ► About ► News ► Job Bank Events ► Resources ► Contact
 


Epidemiologists In The News

[Editor’s Note: As stated last month, no other event in our lifetimes has called upon the knowledge, experience, and expertise of epidemiologists as frequently as the COVID-19 pandemic. Everywhere we turn, epidemiologists are forecasting estimated cases and deaths, being interviewed on television, writing editorials and op-ed articles, and answering questions for a wide variety of audiences. Below is a sample of news items involving epidemiologists  from around the world. ]


Opposed To Lockdowns

Sunetra Gupta, professor of theoretical epidemiology at Oxford University, said in an interview on UnHerd that she is opposed to lockdowns. She added that “I think there’s a chance we might have done better by doing nothing at all, or at least by doing something different , which would have been to pay attention to protecting the vulnerable.” Gupta points out “Different countries have had different lockdown policies, and yet what we’ve observed is almost a uniform pattern of behavior which is highly consistent with the SIR model. To me that suggests that much of the driving force here was due to the build up of immunity.” In other words, that is to say, not due to the social distancing or decreased exposures.


COVID Crush Game

Malia Jones, a social epidemiologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Applied Population Lab has created with her web developer colleague Caitlin Bourbeau a new game to simulate the transmission of COVID-19. Called COVID Crush, the game allows players to try out different physical distancing interventions to see what impact they have in a population of 1,000 people represented by dots in the game. Readers can watch a video on how to play the game here:   https://bit.ly/3egGZnG


“Mass Death By Public Policy”

Greg Gonsalves, Yale epidemiologist was the subject of a report in the Huffington Post over his statements on Twitter stating that the anticipated deaths from COVID-19 constitute “mass death by public policy”. Gonsalves asserted this because he believes that what is happening in the US is purposeful, considered negligence, omission, and failure to act by our leaders. Commenting on the higher risk of death among people of color, Gonsalves said “this is getting awfully close to genocide by default.” Can leaders be held accountable under international law, he asked.  


Two Million Deaths Anticipated

Jayaprakash Muliyil, considered India’s leading epidemiologist and Chairman of the Scientific Advisory Committee of the National Institute of Epidemiology, told Outlook India in an interview that there will be two million deaths in India if a substantial lifting of the lockdown takes place. Despite these large absolute numbers, it represents a low rate, he said. India has a population of 1,360 million people. Because of the different age structure of the Indian population, Muliyil predicted that the rate of death will be lower in India than elsewhere despite the large number of deaths.


“Simply An Epidemiologist”

Anthony Fauci, Head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease has been garnering headlines for weeks. In the process of advising the President, he has created a fan base as well as a host of critics because he has at times disagreed with the President in public. In a colorfully worded article in the NY Post, Rich Lowry says of Fauci, “He is neither the dastardly bureaucratic mastermind imposing his will on the country that his detractors on the right make him out to be, or the philosopher-king in waiting that his boosters on the left inflate him into. He’s simply an epidemiologist, one who brings considerable expertise and experience to the table, but at the end of the day, his focus is inevitably and rightly quite narrow.”


Missing: A Plan To Reclose

Marc Lipsitch, professor of epidemiology at Harvard was interviewed by JAMA to ask about his predictions for the course of the pandemic in the US for the summer and beyond. Lipsitch said “Almost every government is talking about lifting control measures. Not every government, but many, because of the economic burdens. Given the fairly high caseloads that we have in the US, that’s a really risky thing to do right now… Jurisdictions may learn more about which tactics work best in mitigating transmission during this period and may learn whether some mitigation tactics such as school closings are valuable…But the downside is that many jurisdictions will have a plan to open up but not a plan to reclose, leading to more situations like New York, New Orleans, and Detroit where there’s extreme strains on the health care.”   https://bit.ly/2A8wcwJ  ■

 


Reader Comments:
Have a thought or comment on this story ?  Fill out the information below and we'll post it on this page once it's been reviewed by our editors.
 

       
  Name:        Phone:   
  Email:         
  Comment: 
                 
 
       

           


 

 
 
 
      ©  2011 The Epidemiology Monitor

Privacy  Terms of Use  Sitemap

Digital Smart Tools, LLC