The Voice of Epidemiology

    
    


    Web EpiMonitor

► Home ► About ► News ► Job Bank Events ► Resources ► Contact
 
Metaanalysis Concludes “It’s Time To Stop Demonizing Butter”

With US butter consumption at the highest levels in 40 years, understanding the specific contribution of butter, high in saturated fat, to chronic disease risk is more important than ever.  Scientists have long agreed that not all dietary fats should be considered equal.  Research dating back to the 1970’s has suggested that increased intake of saturated fats in particular may contribute to cardiovascular disease and current nutritional guidelines recommend reducing saturated fat intake.  

However, a number of studies have found no link between saturated fat consumption and cardiovascular disease, leading many within the field to question this simplistic view of dietary fats.  More recently, many in the scientific community have begun to argue for a more nuanced approach, shifting the emphasis away from studies and recommendations based on macronutrients such as saturated fat to a more food-based approach that can account for the complex nutrient composition of whole foods such as meat or dairy products.

A recent PLOS One study, a meta-analysis conducted by researchers from Tufts University, Stanford and the University of Sydney, takes exactly such an approach to address the contribution of butter consumption to chronic disease.

Study Design

The authors - Laura Pimpin, Liana del Gobbo,  Dariush Mozaffarin from Tufts University and Jason H.Y. Wu and Hilda Haskelberg from The University  of Sydney, systematically reviewed the literature for prospective observational studies or clinical trials that examined butter consumption and total mortality, cardiovascular disease including coronary heart disease and stroke, and type 2 diabetes.  Only long duration studies with follow ups that were able to isolate butter consumption specifically from other dairy fats were included in the meta-analysis.  The authors selected and reviewed 9 publications containing data from over 636,000 people in 15 different countries with a total of 6.5 million person-years of follow-up during which there were 28,271 total deaths, 9,783 cases of incident cardiovascular disease and 23,954 cases of incident diabetes.  Median butter consumption among cohorts ranged from 4.5 grams/day (0.3 servings) to 46 grams/day (3.2 servings. Only observational cohort studies were considered as they were not able to identify any randomized clinical trials that could be included in their review.

Butter and Disease

Their analysis found that butter intake was not significantly associated with cardiovascular disease or stroke. They did find a slight link between butter consumption and all-cause mortality, with each extra tablespoon consumed daily associated with a 1% increase in overall mortality.  The authors suggest that this effect on total mortality may be due to the fact that people who consume more butter tend to have less healthy diets and lifestyles in general.  

Interestingly, they found that butter consumption was associated with a significantly lower risk of type 2 diabetes.  In this case, each extra tablespoon of daily consumption decreased the risk of developing diabetes by 4%.  While intriguing, this finding is not entirely surprising as other recent studies have found decreased diabetes risk associated with consumption of other dairy foods, such as cheese and yogurt.

Conclusions

Overall, the study concludes that butter consumption has relatively small or neutral associations with long-term health and argue that these findings “do not support a need for major emphasis in dietary guidelines on butter consumption, in comparison to other better established dietary priorities.”  Butter may not be as bad for our health as previously thought, and it may be time to stop demonizing butter, according to the authors. They also point out that we should certainly not consider butter a health food. They argue that the health effects of butter should always be considered against the alternative.  As they put it, “butter may be a more healthful choice than the white bread or potato on which it is commonly spread. In contrast, margarines, spreads, and cooking oils rich in healthful oils, such as soybean, canola, flaxseed, and extra-virgin olive oil, appear to be healthier choices than either butter or refined grains, starches, and sugars.”  Though more research will be needed to fully understand the complex effects of butter and other dairy foods on health and disease, this study demonstrates the utility of a food-based approach to determining dietary guidelines.  

1.  https://tinyurl.com/zos5cbh   ■

 


Reader Comments:
Have a thought or comment on this story ?  Fill out the information below and we'll post it on this page once it's been reviewed by our editors.
 

       
  Name:        Phone:   
  Email:         
  Comment: 
                 
 
       

           


 

 
 
 
      ©  2011 The Epidemiology Monitor

Privacy  Terms of Use  Sitemap

Digital Smart Tools, LLC